"We cannot just let this go" - Lorena Wiebes expelled from Giro d'Italia Women as SD Worx - Protime vow to contest bike weight disqualification
Cycling
Lorena Wiebes was dramatically expelled from the 2026 Giro d'Italia Women on Saturday evening, hours after taking a dominant stage 1 victory and taking the pink jersey. Organisers released a bombshell statement after the podium ceremonies to disqualify Wiebes from the race and award the stage win to Elisa Balsamo.
Organisers said that the bike did not meet the UCI's minimum weight of 6.8 kilograms and weighed at 6.78 kilograms by commissaires, meaning the Team SD Worx – Protime rider's bike did not meet the UCI rules under Article 2.12.007 2.2.
RCS Sport said: "Lorena Wiebes has been excluded from the Giro d'Italia Women for violating rule 2.12.007 - 2.2: Using a bike that does not comply with the rules, in particular by not complying with the minimum weight requirements"
The decision carries the maximum sporting penalty as the Dutch star's stage win and classifications awards were stripped from the record. Her place in the race has also been taken away, meaning she will not be allowed to start Sunday's second stage.
Read also
Team SD Worx – Protime plan to challenge decision
Team SD Worx – Protime have hit back, saying the team is 'astonished' and questioning the bicycle-weighing process in the race. Moreover, claiming there were fluctuations in the bike's weight before and after the stage - questioning the margin of error.
“It will be difficult, but, we cannot just let this go," team manager Erwin Janssen told NOS on Sunday morning. "It is ridiculous that Lorena is being kicked out. This is causing us so much damage. We were going for three or four victories. It is sad. These are the bikes we always ride. And we have never had anything like this happen before.”
He added: “How is that possible? The first one was 70 grams lighter than allowed. The weighing equipment, if this was done at altitude, needs to be recalibrated. That didn't happen, we heard. After the finish, we ourselves came in above 6.83 kilos. But that was indoors, without wind, using our own equipment. We are going to do everything we can, including legally. But they are unyielding. It will be their no against our yes. They will receive a letter stating that we are going to hold them liable for damages suffered.”
The statement, released on Saturday evening, read: "Team SD Worx – Protime is astonished by the decision of the UCI commissaires' panel that Lorena Wiebes' bicycle did not comply with the minimum weight limit after the first stage of the Giro d'Italia Women, in accordance with UCI Article 2.12.007–2.2. According to the jury, the bicycle weighed 6.78 kilograms and therefore did not meet the UCI's minimum weight requirement of 6.8 kilograms."
"The team has serious questions about the bicycle-weighting procedures at the Giro d'Italia Women. For example, there was a weight difference of more than 50 grams between the first and second weighing of Wiebes' bicycle after the finish of the stage in Ravenna."
"Wiebes' disqualification is an exceptionally severe sanction"
The team labelled the Dutch champion sprinter's disqualification as 'exceptionally severe', adding: "Wiebes has ridden this bicycle on multiple occasions this season, always with the same setup. She achieved numerous victories on this bike. Moreover, earlier this year, the bicycle was weighed by UCI officials after several races in which Wiebes won sprint finishes convincingly."
Read also
The statement concluded: "Team SD Worx – Protime believes that Wiebes' disqualification is an exceptionally severe sanction. In a flat sprint stage, unlike a mountain stage, a small reduction in weight provides virtually no advantage.
"This is certainly true for a rider like Wiebes, who won the sprint in Ravenna by three bicycle lengths.Team SD Worx – Protime, a leading team in the women's peloton for the past fifteen years, has no explanation for why Wiebes' bicycle was found to be under the minimum weight on this occasion."
Gavin QuinnCycling Journalist
Gavin Quinn is a cycling journalist and ultra-distance cyclist with a BA in Journalism from Dublin City University. Formerly the Press & Communications Officer for Cycling Ireland, Gavin has worked inside the national team at the World Championships and has reported for the Irish Mirror, Mirror UK, and The42.
His expertise is backed by elite-level access, having interviewed stars like Sam Bennett and Ben Healy, as well as immense personal endurance. In 2025, he completed a 12,000km solo cycle from Ireland to Vietnam, following a 4,600km tour across Europe. From the cobbles of Paris-Roubaix to the gradients of the Tourmalet, Gavin’s writing focuses on the "romance and brutality" of the sport. Having visited 50+ countries, he brings a global, cultural perspective to his coverage of the pro peloton for CyclingUpToDate.
claps 14visitors 9
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
Loading
12 Comments








