Ben Turner wins at La Vuelta! Briton outsprints Jasper Philipsen as Mads Pedersen fumbles stage 4 finale
Cycling
Ben Turner has been crowned the winner of stage 4 of this Vuelta a Espana. The INEOS Grenadiers had shown immense quality as a sprinter over this season, but hadn't shown good form yet in this race, and so it came as a big surprise when he was able to take the win in a sprint where Jasper Philipsen and Mads Pedersen was present.
The fourth day of racing saw the peloton start in Italy and head towards France, a day with a hilly start but one that was not made difficult. Sean Quinn, Louis Vervaeke, Joel Nicolau, Kamiel Bonneau and Mario Aparicio formed the day's breakaway. Later on, Bruno Armirail also gave his best to try and surprise.
It was a rather uneventful day in the peloton with the riders heading towards a certain bunch sprint, albeit an uphill one. Alpecin-Deceuninck nailed the leadout to perfection whilst Mads Pedersen, whose Lidl-Trek had worked all day long for, was nowhere to be seen in the first positions.
Edward Planckaert launched Jasper Philipsen but the truth is Planckaert looked the strongest rider in the sprint, with his leader barely able to get off his wheel. Ben Turner was the only rider to actually be able to go through into the front with speed, and took an impressive maiden Grand Tour win, followed by Philipsen and Planckaert.
Read also
Results powered by FirstCycling.com
FĂ©lix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 3visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Surely the UCI and the race organisers have a responsibility to ensure the best medical care is available to riders when incidents like this happen. All very well pushing for global expansion but not so good if riders lives are put at risk because medical support is not up to scratch.Andy12306-11-2026
- Well it clearly helps that this was Pidcock's own car, no?Occam06-11-2026
- The American performance at the World's road race was a masterclass in cycling tactics. If it wasn't McNulty, it might well have been Jorgensen or Simmons to take off and win in a solo break.Occam06-11-2026
- What a gimmick
Rafionain-Glas06-11-2026 - Thats only cause he rides for UAE. In any other team he would be captain in many races atleast. UAE is just to crazymiguel06-11-2026
- He seems to be the rare athlete whose passion and curiosity about life beyond his sport equals his extraordinary achievements in it. It would be great for him to risk less of that life. He seems very grateful and joyful for what he has already attained.
MarkFour06-11-2026 - As much as I admire and even revere Wout, the less I know about his backside the better.MidnightRider06-11-2026
- Ok, Walt 🤣... Vingegaard would be lucky to get on the poduim. He would not beat Seixas or Del Toro, let alone TP. Then there are the Americans...BD06-11-2026
- So, for starters. Cycling is a saturated, static/dying sport in traditional lands, it will not have resurgences like eg running occasionally does because of several obstacular (yes, I know that’s not a word but don’t make me point out the obvious at your expense) factors. Obviously, like almost everything involving money, there is a desire/need/advantage to growth and that can only come from (developing or just testing) new markets. For me, the WC is the obvious and best choice for several reasons, it comes at the end of the season so is less critical season risk wise, it is not a “pro” team race but nation based which makes integration of uncommon participation more natural. It is a vehicle for redistribution (one of a very limited number of available mechanisms to develop new markers fairly) that the fixed calendar doesn’t allow and it helps make budgets fairer over the long run (moving the whole circus to everywhere evens out everyone’s budget as opposed to having everyone always come to the same location.Jumpyjohn06-11-2026
- Sad that a more refreshing article like this, which could generate discussion in a number of directions, gets completely ignored for the importance of debating the level of superiority of one rider into every single last detail, including a majority of totally hypothetical ones. People complain there is no news in the off season and it’s boring but don’t realise how boring it is to review the same old discussion over and over again, several times a day. In fact, you’d almost think this was a rider fan website. Instead of complaining about the FREE (as long as you pay attention to data use if not unlimited coz this site consumes almost as much for loading Youtube) content, the presence of cv of authors (for the missed obvious reason that it makes it easier to insert extra advertising without changing formats), the lack of quality/checking and depth of articles, why not also think about the content, quality and variety of posts that everyone can contribute to? The platform becomes irrelevant when discussion is interesting.Jumpyjohn06-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments