Frans Maassen, now a respected sports director at Team Visma
| Lease a Bike, has opened up about the personal toll of professional cycling’s
EPO era in the 1990s, a period that drove him out of the sport at just 30 years
old.
Maassen, who won the Amstel Gold Race in 1991 and was tipped
for a glittering career, found himself increasingly outmatched as
performance-enhancing drugs transformed the peloton. While others surged ahead,
Maassen stood still, by choice.
Read also
“I could never understand how it could make such a
difference—how EPO could make you so much stronger,” he said on the In de
Waaier podcast. “We don't have to be so spasmodic about it now as we did
back then. But it was just used a lot in the peloton.”
His recollections are not of a sudden collapse, but of a
slow erosion. One day in particular stood out. “I remember thinking I was
better than ever—and I probably was. But at the Drielandenpunt I was simply
outpaced by more than 100 riders. And we were only halfway there.”
Maassen’s hematocrit levels hovered at 44 or 45, just under
the 50% threshold later used as an EPO detection marker. But as rivals pushed
far beyond it, the sport splintered. “You suddenly had two speeds in cycling,”
he said. “That was very difficult for me, because I didn't win any prizes
anymore. And that was always my drive—to be able to suffer.”
Read also
The loss of competitiveness wasn’t just a professional
crisis. It cut to the heart of his identity. “At one point a spring broke. I
earned quite a lot of money at that time, but I was never able to enjoy it,” he
admitted. “If you are paid as a leader and you can't live up to that, then you
really feel like crap. Those were definitely difficult years. But that wasn't
just true for me. It was a very difficult time for a lot of riders.”
Just about the entire peloton during the 90s were using
performance enhancing drugs, but Maassen managed not to, and that should be applauded,
especially considering the sport is still recovering from the dark cloud caused
by that era.
Asked whether he had ever considered doping, Maassen did not
flinch. “I have thought about it, yes. I dare say that I came close to doing
so. But something held me back, and I am very happy about that now.”
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 6visitors 6
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments