Femke Gerritse denies Marianne Vos and sprints into Red Jersey at La Vuelta Femenina 2025 with stage 3 win
Cycling
Team SD Worx - Protime's Femke Gerritse has sprinted to the win on stage 3 of the 2025 La Vuelta Femenina, denying the legendary Marianne Vos and moving into the Red Jersey of race leader as a result.
A five-woman group rode clear relatively early on to form the breakaway of the day. Best placed on GC at the start of the day was Magdalene Lind of Team Coop - Repsol, just 41 seconds down. As such, the Norwegian was the provisional Red Jersey for much of the day. With 33km still to go though, Lind and the entirety of the break had been caught by the peloton, just in time for the intermediate sprint where bonus seconds were on offer. In that sprint, it was Femke Gerritse who took 6 seconds, Marianne Vos 4 and a very close call between race leader Letizia Paternoster and Cedrine Kerbaol for the final 2 second bonus.
After that sprint, the race erupted into echelon chaos with the wind completely exploding the peloton. Among the notable names caught out behind were Ellen van Dijk, Pauliena Rooijakkers, Marion Bunel, Ashleigh Moolman-Pasio, Riejanne Markus, Anna Henderson and Olivia Baril. At the front meanwhile, Team SD Worx - Protime were keeping the pace high in an attempt to potentially end the GC hopes of those rivals caught out. With just over 15km to go though, the split was undone, and those returning could breathe an almost audible sigh of relief.
With the focus then turning towards the finale and the expected bunch sprint, all the main GC contenders safely navigated themselves through the safety buffer of the 3km to go mark. There was then a big crash inside the final 2km, but when the sprints opened up, it was SD Worx back on the front and in control through Anna van der Breggen. Once Gerritse opened up her sprint, even the legendary Marianne Vos couldn't come around, securing the stage win and the Red Jersey.
Read also
Results powered by FirstCycling.com

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment






