"Tactics play an increasingly small role in modern cycling": Johan Museeuw questions Pogacar and UAE's dominance
Cycling
One of the most common debates in the last months has been whether Tadej Pogacar's superiority makes races too boring. For Belgian legend Johan Museeuw, this is indeed the case.
Speaking to La Dernière Heure, the former World Champion, Tour of Flanders and Paris-Roubaix winner suggested that racing today bears little resemblance to the sport he once knew. “What I find even more regrettable is that tactics play an increasingly small role in modern cycling. Simply put, everything at UAE Team Emirates is very straightforward. They control the race for three hours, then Pogacar attacks with 80 or 100 kilometres to go and wins solo.”
Pogacar vs. Merckx
Axel Merckx, the son of the great Eddy Merckx, offered a contrasting perspective. He admires what Pogacar is doing and finds many similarities between him and his father. “I prefer not to compare generations, but today he dominates the way my father once did. Beyond his incredible list of achievements, what impresses me most is the freshness he still shows after the finish.”
Read also
Despite praising Pogacar’s physical capabilities, Merckx warned that the main risk to the world champion may lie elsewhere. "Wherever he goes, there's always a kind of constant attention on him. And that's what's so exhausting. I was too young to realise it, but when my father talks about the end of his career, it was mainly the mental fatigue, much more than the physical fatigue, that bothered him most. At a certain point, your brain signals your legs to stop."
Museeuw agreed with Merckx's assessment, adding that post-season criteriums are not doing any good to the Slovenian. “In my opinion, this period should mainly be a mental break. His mind needs to recharge, and I'm curious how the Slovenian will handle all of this... A few years ago, I think it was the same lifestyle that contributed to [Peter] Sagan's decline. Even when you're at the top, you need a bit of rest."
Van der Poel as the main threat
Both Museeuw and Merckx agreed that Mathieu van der Poel remains the principal obstacle to Pogacar’s ambition of winning all five Monuments. “The biggest problem for Pogacar in La Primavera, but also in Paris-Roubaix, is Van der Poel,” said Merckx. "Without the Dutchman, Pogi would already have won all the Monuments. It’s that simple. Fortunately for those who think Pogacar is too dominant, Mathieu can make life difficult for him in one-day races.”
Museeuw went further, offering Van der Poel really high praise. “If I could reincarnate as a current rider in the peloton, I would choose Van der Poel without hesitation. Pogacar is obviously the best rider in the world, but I love the class Mathieu exudes and the fact that he only races to win. That’s the only thing that interests him."
Museeuw had already talked about how these two men make cycling less unpredictable, although still interesting for him. "That's what cycling is for the moment, so okay, there's not really a suspense. But I see it in another way, for me it's a suspense, and it will stay a couple of years like that I think, so long as Pogacar is there, he will win the Tour de France and other races. So yeah, it’s a different cycling than in my generation, totally.”
Read also
Read also

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments







