“People think he’s had a bad season because he finished 2nd at the Tour de France” – Criticism of Jonas Vingegaard’s 2025 season “insane” claims Danish legend
Cycling
Danish cycling legend Rolf Sorensen has leapt to the defence of Jonas Vingegaard, dismissing the suggestion that his compatriot's 2025 campaign fell short of expectations as “insane” and pointing to a season that saw him finish second at the Tour de France and claim overall victory at the Vuelta a Espana.
They say you're only as good as your last race and that seems to be the feeling towards Vingegaard as criticism has stemmed largely from his subdued showing at the European Championships, following a late decision to skip the UCI Road World Championships in Kigali. Sorensen, speaking on Café Eddy podcast, argued that Vingegaard’s absence from Rwanda shouldn’t distort what remains an incredibly successful Grand Tour season.
“People seem to think he’s had a bad season because he finished second at the Tour de France. That’s just insane,” Sorensen said. “This is a rider who’s been on the Tour podium for five years in a row and just won the Vuelta. It’s a fantastic season.”
Read also
The Kigali question
When Vingegaard announced on 21 August — two days before the Vuelta start — that he would not ride Worlds after all, it raised eyebrows. Kigali’s demanding course was expected to be tailor-made for Tadej Pogacar, but Sorensen believes Vingegaard was the one rider capable of following him, at least deep into the final.
“If anyone can follow Pogacar, it’s Vingegaard,” Sorensen insisted. “He probably wouldn’t have beaten him, but I really believe he could have won a medal. His form from the Vuelta was still there.”
The Dane ultimately chose to focus on the European Championships in France a week later, citing the need to recover properly from the Vuelta and arrive fresh. That gamble didn’t pay off. He was anonymous at the Euros, later admitting that he’d either had an off day or hadn’t fully recovered after a two-week training pause post-Vuelta.
Had he gone to Kigali instead, Sorensen argued, the sharpness from his Vuelta-winning form might have given him a better chance to contend. “We’ll never know,” Sorensen reflected. “But that opportunity is gone now.”
More than one race
Despite the disappointing end to the season, Vingegaard’s year remains a solid one by any measure. In addition to his Tour runner-up spot and Vuelta victory, he took second at the Critérium du Dauphiné and won the Volta ao Algarve. He finished the year ranked world number two — only the third Dane ever to reach that position after Mads Pedersen and Jakob Fuglsang — and for the fifth straight season, he ended as the highest-ranked Danish male rider.
Before Vingegaard, only Bjarne Riis had ever stood on the Tour de France podium for Denmark. Vingegaard has done so five times in succession, winning twice and finishing runner-up three times. “You’ve got to tear that one bad race out of the book and look at the bigger picture,” Sorensen concluded. “His Worlds absence doesn’t change the fact that we’re witnessing one of the most consistent Grand Tour riders of his generation.”
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 3visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- provoke change, lol. this is a discussion board. nothing is going to change by what I say here. just commenting that it didn't look like MS impeded Brand. beyond that not trying to go too deep.mij09-11-2026
- as excellent as maga rednecks chloe dygert (and quinn simmons)?Ketterechts09-11-2026
- so what i understand is: i left a comment calling out the endless author CVs for being an unnecessary flex of expertise, and you responded by lecturing me (and others) on discrimination and value systems. hats off to you. you definitely lost me!Ketterechts09-11-2026
- I just love the flood of Americans into the top ranks of world cycling. In addition to being studs on the bike, they all seem to be excellent emissaries for our country.Occam09-11-2026
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
Loading
2 Comments









